Can Russians from different parts of the country understand each other?

The people who inhabited Ancient Russia, or Rus, were mostly illiterate, had no dictionaries to check word usage, and didn't bother too much with rules. Therefore, prior to the 14th century, the preliterary Old Russian language was, by definition, based on oral traditions: it was spontaneous and didn’t rely on fussy academicians laying down the law.

By the 14th century, Rus was a patchwork of feudal principalities. Despite some of them languishing under the Tatar-Mongol yoke, the Old Russian language continued to develop. In geographically proximate regions, speech began to develop in different ways, and three dialects gradually emerged: Ukrainian, Belarusian, and Russian. Each of them eventually evolved into a separate language, and the three of them now make up the closely related Eastern Slavic languages, a branch of Indo-European.

Although Russia is vast, linguists distinguish only three groups of Russian dialects: northern, southern, and central, with the latter heavily influenced by the other two.

Igor Isayev, director of the Institute for Linguistics of the Russian State University for Humanities, says that the old dialects in the east of Russia can be tentatively divided by drawing a line across the central European part of the country from Vyatka (Kirov), through Nizhny Novgorod, to Saratov in the south.

All dialects east of this border—which means the whole of the Urals, Siberia, and the Far East—were formed on the basis of the dialects of the earliest settlement of Slavs. This is the language of settlers from central Russia, which has changed little over the ages.

Therefore, you won’t feel a huge difference between the speech patterns in Vladivostok and Moscow, whereas travelers between northern Arkhangelsk and southern Krasnodar will have to retune their ears.

Differences exist at all levels of the language: in phonetics (pronunciation of sounds), morphology (changes to word endings based on case and number), and vocabulary (no explanation required). Here are just a few of the distinguishing features:

One of the most striking characteristics of the southern dialect (Ryazan, Kursk, Voronezh, Belgorod) is the so-called “gekanie” phenomenon, or in academic parlance: “fricative g.” It is designated by the Greek gamma sign γ, but pronounced as a soft “kh.” More often than not, it is a devoiced “g” at the end of a word in front of a vowel. For example, instead of “snega” (literally “of snow”) people say “snekha.” The further south you venture, the deeper and more guttural the “g” becomes, and it even starts appearing at the beginning of words. In Krasnodar, for instance, you might hear “khorod” instead of “gorod” (“town/city”). Incidentally, even further south, in Ukraine, “gekanie” is the literary norm.

Whereas Central Russian inhabitants often pronounce unstressed “o” as “a” (“Maskva” not “Moskva”—the word for “Moscow”), northerners are identifiable by their clear-sounding “o.” Incidentally, “akanie” can be heard when some Russians speak English. For example, instead of “Obama” you might hear “Abama.”

This feature is typical for the north and south of Russia. For example, peasants on Leo Tolstoy’s estate at Yasnaya Polyana called their master “grakh” instead of “graf” (“count”).

In the north, people like to say “ts” instead of “ch.” “Pechka” (“stove”) becomes “petska,” and “vnuchok” (“grandson”) turns into “vnutsok.”

That doesn’t happen in the south, but instead they soften the letter “t” at the end of third-person verbs (similar to the infinitive form): “on khodit” (“he walks”) starts to sound “khodit’.”